Read the latest market commentaries, outlooks and thought leadership from Invesco professionals in Asia and around the world.

Our investment teams provide insights covering markets events, asset classes and investment-related topics effecting our clients.

Latest Materials

Expand all
Collapse allExpand all

Quarterly Economic Outlook 2018 Q3 

Short-term disruption unlikely to derail the fundamental factors driving the global business cycle upswing(July 2018)

Markets have been grappling with a combination of uncertainties, including intensifying trade tensions, the strengthening US dollar, Brexit and the slow-burn financial and political problems of the Eurozone. While these may rattle markets in the short term, I believe that none of these issues are sufficient on their own to derail the fundamental factors driving the global business cycle upswing. I also do not expect the current interest rate increases in the US, the first of the major economies to have initiated the process of monetary policy normalisation, to stifle the current upswing.

For more details, please download the full text of the article.

Market Outlook - Monthly

October 2018 (covering September 2018)


  • The US equity market ended September in positive territory despite escalating trade tensions and US Federal Reserve’s (Fed) decision to raise interest rates. Both healthcare and energy stock were the best performers over the month.
  • The US equities should benefit from an acceleration in US economic growth and the recently passed tax reform legislation. However, valuations are stretched, and the earnings boost may be offset by lower p/e multiples as bond yields and the discount rate rise.

Europe (including UK)

  • European and UK equity markets were broadly flat during September. Trade war rhetoric and Italian budget concerns weighed on market sentiment. Financials and  energy were the best performing sector. Italy posted the best returns in the regions.
  • The Eurozone economy is growing solidly; valuations on European equities are attractive. Though the ECB is tapering QE, its balance sheet is still expanding and inflation is still below target.

Asia Pacific (ex Hong Kong ex China ex Japan)

  • Asian equity markets fell in September. Thailand was the best performer, while India and Philippines were among the worst performing markets in the region. Concerns regarding trade tension, interest rate trajectory in the US continued to weigh on market sentiment.
  • In longer term, we believe the region’s growth will be supported by strong domestic consumption and continued structural reforms, and investors should remain focused on solid bottom-up opportunities that can benefit from those key growth drivers.

Hong Kong and Mainland China (H-shares)

  • Offshore Chinese market declined in September. Investor sentiments have modestly recovered as lower-than-expected initial tariff rates and Chinese government’s reiteration on supporting domestic economy. Hong Kong equity market slightly outperformed China.
  • We see the impact of tighter liquidity and rising interest rate on the economy.  We believe the trade tension continued to overshadow equity market, with valuation at more attractive levels.


  • Japan’s equity market gained in September. The market shrugging off concerns about the outlook for the Chinese economy and trade tensions with the US eased slightly from their perspective. Japanese companies delivered solid earnings results, maintaining recent positive growth momentum.
  • Japanese stocks will likely benefit from the continuation of a very accommodative monetary policy environment in Japan and regional / global growth. Protectionism is a growing risk.

Fixed Income

  • In September the sentiment strengthened government bonds sold-off. The rise in government bond yields had a negative impact on corporate bond yields, however, the premium over government bonds that companies must pay to borrow was broadly unchanged over the month.
  • Bonds in general seem expensive, notably US Treasuries, as fiscal policy turns expansionary at full employment amid some upward pressure on wages and inflation. Favor higher yielding segments of fixed income: corporate investment grade, US municipal bonds and bank loans.

Emerging Markets

  • In September the emerging equity markets performance was mixed. Latin American and EMEA making gains, whereas Asia was dragged lower by weakness in India.
  • Emerging market stocks have come under pressure because of several country-specific crises, as well as the strengthening dollar in general, despite attractive valuations. Protectionism is a growing risk as well. We expect these conditions to continue. Investors must be selective and discerning in this space.

What's in store for markets in the second half?

Five trends to watch for during the remainder of 2018

Author: Kristina Hooper (Chief Global Market Strategist)

We are coming to the mid-year point for 2018, and the past six months have felt like six years. Markets have experienced a significant uptick in volatility, yet equity investors may not have much to show for all their troubles. Year-to-date performance as of June 22 shows many major indices in the red: the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index lost 3.53%, the MSCI EAFE Index is down 3.43%, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index lost 6.08%. One of the few exceptions is the S&P 500 Index, which is up a modest 3.04% for the same period.1 What happened? And what are markets telling us about the global economy?

Four key forces have been pressuring stocks

1. Lower growth. While first-quarter earnings were generally strong, markets are viewing those results in the rearview mirror. The bigger focus is what’s ahead — what economic conditions could mean for earnings in the second quarter and beyond. Unfortunately, many major economies — including the US, the eurozone and Japan — experienced a deceleration in growth in the first quarter. While this was largely seasonal, and for some economies could be attributed to poor weather conditions, the first-quarter slowdown appears to have bled into at least the start of the second quarter for most of these economies — except the US — based on recent economic data.

2. Higher costs. Not only do we need to worry about lower growth, we also need to worry about input costs, which cause a narrowing of profit margins. In the April release of the US Federal Reserve’s Beige Book, business owners and managers indicated significant concern about aluminum and steel tariffs driving up input costs. And then there’s the rise in oil prices which, although it has eased recently, could also impact input costs. For example, oil prices helped to push up input cost inflation in the eurozone, which is at its second-highest level in seven years.2 And I fully expect upcoming US employment situation reports to show that wage growth is rising. Rising costs cause a narrowing of profit margins, all else being equal, which in turn reduces earnings.

3. Monetary policy concerns. And then there’s concern that very accommodative monetary policy might soon end. I believe it’s no coincidence that the February market sell-off began the same week that former Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Janet Yellen handed over the reins to Jerome Powell, which brought uncertainty over whether the Fed would remain so accommodative. In recent weeks, those concerns seem to be coming to fruition: The Fed’s policy-making arm (the Federal Open Market Committee) increased its median policy prescription for the federal funds rate, and the European Central Bank (ECB) announced it would end tapering by December. We also saw jitters earlier this year when markets began to fear that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) would begin normalization sooner than expected — although the BOJ quickly refuted that concern.

4. Geopolitical uncertainty. We have seen a lot of geopolitical uncertainty in recent months. The difficulty Germany had in forming a coalition government, the strained relationship between the different political parties in that coalition, the difficulty the UK has had in orchestrating its Brexit from the European Union, and the fluctuation of tensions between the US and North Korea are just a few of the geopolitical risks adding to the volatility we have experienced this year. The most recent example is the potential for Italy’s coalition government to disrupt not only Italy, but the European Union.

Outlook for the second half of the year

Below are five trends that I expect to see during the remainder of 2018:

1. The global economy should accelerate modestly from here. The US is already showing signs of re-acceleration, and I expect other major economies to follow suit, albeit more modestly. Although this is not a synchronized global growth environment, most economies should improve in the back half of this year. In other words, the lower growth we are currently experiencing is likely only temporary, in my view.

Take the eurozone — I believe there are still positive drivers of this region’s economic growth in 2018.
• The European Commission’s Economic Sentiment Indicator fell slightly for the first quarter, but remains consistent with strong gross domestic product growth.3
• Unemployment continues to fall in the eurozone, although there are significant differences by country.

Globally, growth seems solid. In fact, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects the global economy to grow at 3.9% for both 2018 and 2019.4 And, while I believe input costs are on the rise, I don’t expect them to significantly impact profit margins in the near term — unless tariffs proliferate quickly.

2. Globally, the upward bias for stocks remains — but it is diminishing. Given that global growth is likely to accelerate and monetary policy is still generally accommodative, there should still be an upward bias for stocks globally, in my view. I believe that growth and supportive monetary policy are powerful forces that are likely to help stocks end in positive territory for the year. However, that bias is diminishing as monetary policy tightens – and the threat of protectionism grows.

3. I expect to see more disruption and greater volatility. As monetary policy normalizes, I believe capital markets will normalize as well due to an erosion of the support that the Fed’s policy has given to stocks. In this environment, I expect a continued reduction in correlations among stocks as fundamentals matter more. In addition, I expect a continued increase in volatility as monetary policy accommodation is reduced, and geopolitical disruption would further exacerbate that volatility.

While this is not my base case, I think it’s worth noting that the Fed may add to monetary policy disruption as balance sheet normalization progresses, given how powerful a tool it is. The pre-set course calls for an increasingly larger amount of assets to be rolled off the Fed’s balance sheet each quarter. I suspect this could have the opposite effect that quantitative easing had on stocks, putting downward pressure on them and creating more volatility. Complicating this scenario further is that the Fed seems to be preoccupied with the yield curve and concerned about what could happen if it inverted. There is the possibility that, in order to avoid an inverted yield curve, the Fed may accelerate balance sheet normalization. That could be very disruptive for capital markets, particularly equities.

4. Debt pressures are expected to grow. The world is becoming increasingly indebted. As borrowing costs rise, debt is becoming a bigger issue for consumers, businesses and the government. In its most recent Global Financial Stability Report, the IMF warned about the growing debt overhang occurring in different economies.5 This problem is widespread and may have negative effects in any economy that is raising rates. For example, Canadian homeowners are showing signs of coming under pressure given that many have adjustable-rate mortgages. And the headwinds that many emerging markets economies have faced can be at least partly attributed to higher borrowing costs. As monetary policy normalization continues and accelerates in coming years, this pressure is likely to increase. In addition to the short-term effects of debt pressure, there is a long-term effect as well: More money spent on servicing debt means less money available for investment purposes, and that will impact longer-term economic growth.

5. Protectionism continues to cast a shadow. I can’t say it enough: Tariffs are like bacteria in a petri dish — they multiply quickly. I expect current protectionist threats and actions will not dissipate, but will in fact escalate. At times, protectionist threats and actions have sent stocks downward, but investors have been all too willing to believe the threat has passed at the first sign of an abatement in trade drama. For example, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s conciliatory speech at the Boao Forum in March was all investors needed to hear to send stocks upward. But we all know how that ended — with a flareup in trade tensions and clear signs that Xi has no interest in making serious concessions.

Investors should not ignore this very real threat. Protectionism can raise input costs significantly, which can create demand destruction. For example, in 1984, US consumers paid an estimated $53 billion in higher prices because of import restrictions levied that year.6 The day before US President Donald Trump’s tariff announcement, the US Chamber of Commerce issued a statement that US steel prices are already nearly 50% higher than steel prices in Europe and China.7

In addition, the current tariff rhetoric and actions are increasing economic policy uncertainty, which has historically coincided with a slowdown in business investment. In a recent ECB meeting, ECB President Mario Draghi explained that protectionism as well as threats of protectionist actions can “have a profound and rapid effect on business, on exporters’ confidence … and confidence can in turn affect growth.” I strongly believe that business sentiment and, more importantly, business spending are already showing signs of being hurt by the recent wave of protectionism, and it could get worse from here. We can’t forget that in trade wars, retaliation is not limited to tariffs — it can take different forms, such as devaluing a currency or reducing US Treasury purchases or selling existing holdings of US Treasuries.

I can’t stress enough that a significant rise in trade wars could eliminate the upward bias for stocks that currently exists, so we will need to follow the situation closely.

What does this mean for investors?

In this environment, I believe exposure to risk assets is important for meeting long-term goals — especially given my view that an upward bias for stocks continues to exist (albeit in a weaker form). However, mitigating downside risk will be critical, in my view, and that includes being well-diversified within equities and fixed income. And, perhaps most important during this period of uncertainty, I believe that exposure to alternative investments can help with diversification and risk mitigation. That may include strategies such as market neutral portfolios and other lower-correlating asset classes, including those with income-producing potential. One alternative investment to consider is real estate investment trusts (REITs), including non-traditional REITs.

1 Source: Bloomberg, L.P., as of June 22, 2018
2 Source: IHS Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI, June 2018
3 Source: European Commission
4 Source: IMF, as of April 2018
5 Source: IMF Global Financial Stability Report, October 2017
6 Source: Gary Hufbauer and Howard Rosen, “Trade Policy for Troubled Industries,” Washington DC Institute for International Economics, 1986
7 Source: US Chamber of Commerce, May 30, 2018

Focus on Asia – Volatility in EM currencies

May 24, 2018

Q1) Year-to-date, we have seen some Emerging Market currencies, especially Latin America, being sold off on the prospects of US rate normalization. It seems that Asian currencies have been more resilient. In your opinion, what’s the reason behind this?
Dr Greenwood: Those EM currencies that sold off most in early 2018 were those that had been plagued by recent monetary or political instability (Argentina, Turkey, Brazil). Conversely, those EM currencies that have outperformed have been mainly those that are seen as oil/energy exporters (Colombia, Mexico and Malaysia). This is in line with the recent strong performance of oil prices.

The resilience of the Chinese CNY, Thai THB, Taiwanese TWD, Korean KRW and Singapore SGD seems to be due to the fact that they are mostly manufacturers that have enjoyed a year or two of improving exports, in line with improving world trade. Although recently economic growth has slowed in the US (Q1) and is slowing in Europe, these slowdowns are probably only temporary following a very strong end to 2017. In my view the most likely scenario is a continued expansion of the US business cycle which should translate into further growth of Asian exports.

Q2) Recent global / Asia economic data have come in softer than expected (e.g. as shown in Citi’s Economic Surprise Index), what do you think are the major reasons for the data disappointment?
Dr Greenwood: The main reason for the recent weakness is that economic expectations and growth were at an unsustainable level in the final quarter of 2017. Encouraged by the proposed personal and corporate tax cuts in the United States that were under discussion at that time and signed into law on December 22, global equity markets continued with a strong rally until the end of January. By any standards that upswing was over-exuberant. The correction in February and March has returned US stock market indices to roughly where they were at the end of December.

It was a similar story in the US economy. Coincidentally, the Citi Economic Surprise Index for the US (an index that measures data surprises relative to market expectations) peaked at 84.5 on December 22 – the same day Mr Trump signed the Tax legislation -- but has basically been falling since then, declining to 10.9 on May 22.

Consistent with the slowdown in developed economies, emerging Asian economies have seen falls in their exports in recent months. For example, Korean and Taiwanese exports (in US$ terms) have both declined since yearend. Others have seen declines in PMIs, factory orders and so on. All this is essentially a spill-over effect from temporary softness in the US and European economies.

Q3) Do you think Asian currencies would be vulnerable for sell-off in the months ahead? What are the positive and negative factors you could see for Asian currencies in the coming few months? And more importantly, under this situation, could further rate hikes by the US pose a threat to Asia?
Dr Greenwood: The main negative for all EM currencies is the continuing increase in USD interest rates and bond yields under the Federal Reserve’s normalization policies. If interest rate differentials between the USD on the one hand and Asian and EM currencies on the other continue to widen, we should expect some further appreciation of the USD. A strong USD has historically been negative for EM currencies, especially commodity producers. This is a price effect that will hurt higher cost EM economies, and benefit only those that are price-competitive, which includes some Asian manufacturers.

However, provided that the US economy continues to grow (i.e. this is only a rise in US rates and not a downturn in US economic growth), then Asian manufacturing exporters should continue to benefit from volume growth. But we should not exaggerate these movements and effects. So far the USD has strengthened only 4-5% on a trade-weighted basis since mid-April, essentially recovering the ground lost in December and January. The USD is still about 8% below where it stood in December 2016. Compared to Asian and EM currencies the USD is still relatively weaker than it was in December 2016.

2018 Investment Outlook

We are dedicated to helping clients achieve their investment objectives

We are dedicated to helping clients achieve their investment objectives

The surging markets of the past year have taken place against a backdrop of macro developments whose long-term impact on the world economy has yet to be realized:  uncertainty regarding the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, potential tax reform in the US, North Korea’s nuclear weapons testing, continued oil price volatility and the outcome of key elections in Germany, France, Iran and other countries.

With this as context, the year ahead promises to be interesting and challenging as well.  In this dynamic environment, we have a strong view that clients are best served by portfolios that combine the advantages of active, passive and alternative capabilities.

At Invesco, we’ve built our firm over many years with a single focus:  to help clients achieve their investment objectives in a variety of markets.  We provide a comprehensive range of investment capabilities, delivered through a diverse set of investment vehicles.  We draw on this comprehensive range of capabilities to provide customized solutions designed to deliver key outcomes aligned to client needs, which are our most important benchmark.

Our experienced investment teams are located in locations all over the globe, which we believe is a real strength of the firm.  Maintaining a presence on the ground in key cities enables our investment teams to stay close to developments that impact the markets and the companies in which they invest.

An important part of achieving your investment objectives depends on keeping ahead of the dynamics that drive movements in the global markets.  Working with our investment teams, we’ve developed this 2018 outlook to provide insights that can help you plan for the future and make decisions about your investments.

We hope you find this information helpful.  As always, we remain focused on helping clients achieve their investment objectives – wherever the markets take us.


The above materials have been prepared only for those persons to whom Invesco has provided it for informational purposes only. It is not an offering of a financial product and is not intended for and should not be distributed to retail clients who are resident in jurisdiction where its distribution is not authorized or is unlawful. Circulation, disclosure, or dissemination of all or any part of the above materials to any person without the consent of Invesco is prohibited.

The above materials may contain statements that are not purely historical in nature but are "forward-looking statements," which are based on certain assumptions of future events. Forward-looking statements are based on information available on the date hereof, and Invesco does not assume any duty to update any forward-looking statement. Actual events may differ from those assumed. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements, including any projected returns, will materialize or that actual market conditions and/or performance results will not be materially different or worse than those presented.

The information in the above materials has been prepared without taking into account any investor’s investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Before acting on the information the investor should consider its appropriateness having regard to their investment objectives, financial situation and needs.

You should note that this information:

  • may contain references to amounts which are not in local currencies;
  • may contain financial information which is not prepared in accordance with the laws or practices of your country of residence;
  • may not address risks associated with investment in foreign currency denominated investments; and
  •  does not address local tax issues.

​All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable and current, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Investment involves risk. Please review all financial material carefully before investing. The opinions expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.

The distribution and offering of the above materials in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law.  Persons into whose possession this marketing material may come are required to inform themselves about and to comply with any relevant restrictions. This does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation